Competitors
Learn more about the market and how we make difference
Competitors based on augmented reality glasses
Example: XYZ Reality (UK).
Disadvantages:
- Narrow viewing angle limits the field of view.
- No ability to make notes directly on the object.
- Gesture control only, which is inconvenient and limits functionality.
- Only one person can interact with the model at a time.
- The main disadvantage is that it is unsafe to use in construction conditions.
Tablet-based competitors:
Examples: Trimble Connect AR (USA), Gamma AR (Spain), VGIS (Canada), Yijian AR (China), Vanjian BIMAR (China).
Advantages:
- A more flexible and accessible device compared to glasses.
- Convenient interface and user-friendly interaction format.
Disadvantages:
- Tablets only support augmented reality (AR) but not mixed reality (MR), which limits their ability to accurately visualize BIM models on the construction site.
- Tablets cannot effectively work with large BIM models due to the limitations of their graphics cards.
BIM Scanner Solution:
Advantages over competitors:
- We have developed a specialized device that allows working with large BIM models and supports both augmented and mixed reality.
- The device eliminates the key limitations of glasses and tablets, offering a safer and more efficient solution for construction sites.
